Community Guidelines
How we keep sovraSpace™ a civic space

Civic discourse starts with respect.

sovraSpace exists so constituents and communities can engage meaningfully with government. These guidelines protect that mission, and each other.

The Spirit of sovraSpace

We are a civic platform, not a general social network. The bar here is different. Political disagreement is expected and welcome, but it must be grounded in facts, good faith, and respect for other people's humanity.

Freedom of speech, and the practice of freedom of speech, on sovraSpace is freedom of speech that does not come at the detriment and belittlement of others.

That's the standard. Everything else here operationalizes it.

We distinguish between two things people sometimes lump together:

  • Detriment.Real, identifiable harm to another person. Doxxing them. Threatening them. Coordinating to flood their account with abuse. These aren't opinions; they're actions that injure.
  • Belittlement.Dehumanizing another person on the basis of who they are. Slurs. Identity attacks. Saying a class of people is less than human. These aren't arguments; they're erasures.

You can disagree with anyone on sovraSpace, vigorously, factually, and at length. You cannot harm them, and you cannot dehumanize them.

We call this "attack ideas, not people." Bills, court rulings, voting records, policy positions, and political behavior are all fair targets. The people who hold those positions deserve the dignity of being argued with, not dismissed as subhuman or threatened into silence.

This applies equally regardless of political affiliation. A post attacking a conservative representative is held to the same standard as a post attacking a progressive representative. The facts are the facts. The guidelines are the guidelines.

Debate ideasShare sourcesRepresent your districtDon't attack peopleDon't spread disinfo

What We Encourage

Linking to the actual bill text when discussing legislation
Sharing voting records and public data to support your argument
Tagging your posts accurately (BILL, EXECUTIVE ORDER, FINANCE, etc.)
Engaging with constituents from opposing viewpoints civilly
Starting or signing petitions on real local issues
Correcting misinformation politely and with a source
Acknowledging when you were wrong or when new facts emerge
Reporting content that violates these guidelines

Civil Discourse

Disagreement is healthy. Contempt is not. Here's the line:

'I strongly disagree with Rep. Smith's vote on HB 4521 because...'
'The data from CBO shows this bill would increase the deficit by $300B'
'I think you're wrong about this. Here's the source I'm looking at'
Personal insults, slurs, or dehumanizing language directed at anyone
'You should be ashamed of yourself' or other shame-based attacks
Posting someone's personal information to invite harassment
Coordinated pile-ons or mass reporting to silence opposing views

No Slurs, Period

We don't allow slurs on sovraSpace. This applies to:

  • Racial and ethnic slurs (including the N-word in all variants. No override, no "reclamation" exception.)
  • Slurs based on gender or sex (including misogynistic slurs)
  • Slurs based on sexual orientation
  • Slurs based on gender identity
  • Slurs based on disability
  • Slurs based on religion
  • Slurs based on national origin or immigration status
  • Slurs targeting any group based on protected characteristics, including the majority. Anti-white slurs are treated at the same severity as anti-minority slurs.

We considered the "reclamation" exception, the argument that a member of a group should be able to use a slur targeting their own group. After consideration, we landed on "no slurs, period" because:

  1. The platform can't reliably verify in-group membership.
  2. Even genuine reclamation creates discoverability problems for users who don't want to encounter the term.
  3. The civic context of sovraSpace is different from the cultural context where reclamation arguments are strongest.
  4. The clarity of "no slurs, period" is enforceable. The alternative is a moderation labyrinth that erodes consistency.

If this isn't the platform you're looking for, that's a fair conclusion. There are other platforms with different stances. We respect that choice.

Misinformation & Civic Integrity

Misinformation about government and elections undermines sovracy. We take it seriously, especially claims that could suppress participation.

Three kinds of disagreement, treated three ways:
  1. Factual disagreement about civic data ("the bill says X / the bill says Y"). Allowed, normal, healthy. Cite sources.
  2. Interpretive disagreement about what civic data means ("this provision will help / hurt small businesses"). Allowed, normal, healthy.
  3. False claims that misrepresent objective civic facts ("this representative voted for X" when they voted against, "this bill contains X" when it doesn't). Not allowed, subject to enforcement.

We don't moderate based on whose interpretation is correct in a contested political debate. We do moderate based on whether claims about objectively verifiable civic facts are accurate.

Election integrity gets specific treatment. False claims about election results, that a certified election was stolen, that votes were changed, that a result differed from what was certified, are treated at a heightened severity tier regardless of the political direction of the false claim. Amplification of election misinformation is a documented threat to democratic participation, and the platform won't carry it.

What's prohibited:
False claims about when, where, or how to vote
Fabricated quotes attributed to real politicians or officials
Misrepresenting the outcome of elections that have been certified
Altered images or audio designed to deceive (deepfakes)
Presenting opinion or speculation as established fact without labeling it as such
Good-faith mistakes are not violations
If you post something inaccurate in good faith and correct it when notified, that is not a violation. The rule targets deliberate deception, not honest errors.

Perspective Diversity & Your Civic Lens

Civic engagement requires exposure to diverse perspectives. Echo chambers, where you only see content that reinforces your existing views, undermine informed citizenship. sovraSpace actively works to prevent this.

Your Civic Lens

Your Civic Lens controls how much diverse content appears in your feed. There are three tiers:

Explore (Wide Lens)Default. ~30 to 40% diverse content. Widest civic exposure. You'll regularly encounter perspectives outside your usual interests.
Balanced (Steady Lens)~20 to 25% diverse content. Your interests with regular new perspectives mixed in.
Focused (Narrow Lens)~10 to 15% diverse content. This is as narrow as it gets. A minimum floor ensures you're never fully siloed.
You can change your tier anytime in Settings > Content Discovery.
What we encourage
Engaging with posts from perspectives different than your own
Responding to opposing viewpoints with data and sources, not dismissal
Adjusting your Civic Lens as your civic engagement matures
Reporting genuinely harmful content, not content you disagree with
What is prohibited (echo chamber gaming)
Mass-blocking users specifically to eliminate a viewpoint category from your feed
Coordinated mass-reporting to suppress content you disagree with (treated as manipulation)
Stacking topic mutes to circumvent the diversity floor (topic mutes capped at 25% of categories)
Creating multiple accounts to avoid diversity settings
Enforcement
Echo chamber gaming is treated at the same enforcement level as spam and inauthenticity: warning, then suspension, then ban.

Algorithmic Integrity

Reactions are civic signals, not suppression tools

Using Fuckery Upset on a post does NOT cause that viewpoint to be buried in your feed or anyone else's. All three reactions are equal civic signals. None suppress content.

The reactions exist to give you a low-friction outlet for affective response, frustration, disagreement, contempt, that doesn't require composing a post in the heat of the moment. They channel emotional response away from the post body, where things tend to escalate.

Joyful Fuckery Clown Foolery Fuckery Upset
Blocks remove people, not perspectives

Blocking a user removes that individual from your experience. It does not remove their viewpoint category. Similar perspectives from other users will still appear based on your Civic Lens tier.

Topic mute cap

You can mute specific civic topics (e.g., FINANCE, ELECTION) but cannot mute more than 25% of all available categories. This ensures your feed maintains breadth.

False reports are penalized

Reporting a post because you disagree with it, not because it violates guidelines, constitutes abuse of the reporting system. Repeated false reports may result in enforcement action against the reporter.

Harassment & Safety

Everyone on sovraSpace, constituent, journalist, or elected official, has the right to participate without fear of harassment or threats.

Threats of violence or wishes of harm toward any person
Doxxing, publishing private addresses, phone numbers, or identifying information
Targeted harassment campaigns against individuals
Sexual harassment, unsolicited sexual content, or sexual coercion
Content that encourages others to harass a specific person
Child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Any content depicting or facilitating the sexual exploitation of minors is removed immediately, the account is permanently banned, and the content is reported to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) under 18 U.S.C. § 2258A as required by federal law. There is no appeal for this category.

Public officials accept scrutiny of their official conduct. Criticism of their votes, policies, or public statements is fair game. Their personal safety and that of their families is not.

Data Integrity & Accuracy

sovraSpace relies on accurate information to serve its civic mission. AI-generated summaries are helpful but imperfect. We count on the community to help us maintain high standards of accuracy.

Reporting incorrect AI summaries using the Report button on any summary
Fact-checking AI summaries against the original bill text or court opinion
Sharing corrections in comments with links to official sources
Flagging outdated information that no longer reflects current legislation
Deliberately reporting accurate summaries as inaccurate to disrupt the platform
Using report tools to spam or harass moderators
Your reports make sovraSpace better
Every summary report is reviewed by our team. When we confirm an inaccuracy, we fix it and improve our AI prompts to prevent similar errors. You are directly helping build a more trustworthy civic platform.

Authenticity & Spam

Civic engagement only has value if it's real. Artificial amplification undermines everyone.

Creating fake accounts to impersonate real people or organizations
Using bots or automation to post, like, or follow at scale
Coordinating with groups to artificially inflate a petition or post
Posting the same content repeatedly across multiple posts
Buying or selling followers, reactions, or engagement

Digital Wellness

sovraSpace is committed to healthy civic engagement. We enforce daily screen time limits for all users to prevent doomscrolling and promote intentional use of the platform.

Taking breaks and respecting your daily screen time limits
Adjusting your limits in Settings to match your personal wellness needs
Using the Help & Emergency Resources page if you need support
Attempting to bypass screen time limits through multiple accounts or technical workarounds
Creating an account if you are under 18. sovraSpace is an 18+ platform.

Engaging with sovraHeadlines

sovraHeadlines is sovraSpace's automated civic-updates persona. It runs across two surfaces: a headlines rail that aggregates public RSS feeds and links out to their source publications, and a short-posts pipeline that generates ≤500-character event notices about federal bills reaching milestone stages and newly filed federal court cases. Short posts are drafted by an AI model and admin-reviewed before publish. Treat interactions with sovraHeadlines as you would with any journalist.

Commenting on and replying to sovraHeadlines short posts with questions or additional context
Reporting inaccuracies or concerning AI behavior through the feedback button
Engaging critically with sovraHeadlines content — fact-check it against official sources
Attempting to manipulate sovraHeadlines into generating biased or harmful content
Harassing or spamming sovraHeadlines with bad-faith comments designed to disrupt
Misrepresenting sovraHeadlines short posts as human-written journalism

Sharing Content Responsibly

sovraSpace makes it easy to share civic content externally. With that power comes responsibility. When sharing sovraSpace content, represent it accurately and in good faith.

Sharing articles, posts, and bills with accurate context and attribution to sovraSpace
Including a link to the original sovraSpace content when sharing excerpts or summaries
Encouraging others to visit sovraSpace to read the full content and engage civically
Altering, cropping, or manipulating shared content to misrepresent its meaning
Sharing misinformation using sovraSpace content as a false source of authority
Removing AI-generated labels from sovraHeadlines short posts when sharing externally
Attribution matters
When sharing sovraSpace content externally, always include attribution to sovraSpace. Misrepresenting the source or altering content to mislead is a violation of these guidelines.

Civic Score & Conduct

Your Civic Score reflects your genuine engagement with civic content. The following will result in score deductions:

Violation
Deduction Level
Appeal
Spam or bot behavior
Level 1, Automatic
No
False or misleading civic claims
Level 2, Reviewed
Yes, 14 days
Harassment, abuse, identity attacks
Level 3, Reviewed
Yes, 14 days
Repeated violations after prior deductions
Level 4, Senior review
Yes, 7 days
Severe violations (slurs, threats, doxxing, election misinformation, CSAM)
Level 5, Immediate
No

Deductions are always visible in your score history with the reason stated. You will always be notified.

To appeal a Level 2, 3, or 4 deduction, contact appeals@sovraos.com with your account handle and the deduction ID shown in your score history. We respond to appeals within 10 business days. Level 1 (automated, low-stakes) and Level 5 (severe) deductions are not appealable.

Enforcement

We enforce these guidelines consistently, regardless of political affiliation. Enforcement is proportional to severity and history.

How enforcement works in layers
  1. Automated detection at compose time. Pattern-based detection (regex) catches slurs and known violation patterns before you publish. You may see a soft warning asking you to reconsider, or a hard-block modal preventing the post from being submitted.
  2. Civility signals. Beyond exact patterns, we use Google Cloud Natural Language API thresholds for insult, toxicity, and derogatory tone. These inform moderation triage, not auto-block.
  3. User reports. Every post, comment, and article has a flag button. Reported content goes into a moderation queue.
  4. Human review. The moderation team reviews flagged content. Senior review handles edge cases.
  5. AI-assisted classification. AI assistance helps triage reports and identify patterns. Final enforcement decisions on Level 2+ violations involve a human.
Enforcement actions, in escalating order
  • Soft signal at compose time. A content warning shown before posting, asking you to reconsider. No record kept if you change the post.
  • Hard block at compose time. A modal preventing the post from being submitted, with explanation of which guideline applies. No score impact; nothing recorded against your account.
  • Content removal. The post is removed, you are notified, and the action is recorded in your moderation history.
  • Civic Score deduction. See "Civic Score & Conduct" above.
  • Warning. First-time minor violations. Content may be removed. Account is in good standing.
  • Temporary suspension. Repeated violations or moderate severity. 1 to 30 days depending on context.
  • Permanent ban. Severe violations (threats, CSAM, coordinated manipulation) or repeated suspensions.
Appeals

To appeal a moderation action, email appeals@sovraos.com within 30 days. We respond within 14 days.

If you believe you were permanently banned in error, you may submit a one-time merits-review request to legal@sovraos.com within 30 days of the ban. Review is at our discretion. Bans are not negotiated, but legitimate misidentifications are corrected.

How to Report

See something that violates these guidelines? Use the report button on any post. Reports are reviewed in order of severity:

Threats & violence. Reviewed within 2 hours.
Harassment campaigns. Reviewed within 24 hours.
Misinformation. Reviewed within 72 hours.
Spam & inauthenticity. Reviewed within 1 week.
False or bad-faith reports may result in action against the reporting account.

If You're in Crisis

If you or someone you know is in immediate danger, call 911. If you're struggling and need support, our Help & Emergency Resources page has free, confidential, 24/7 resources for crisis intervention, mental health, domestic violence, child protection, LGBTQ+ youth support, veterans, and more, including state-specific crisis lines.

sovraSpace cannot intervene in emergencies. Please reach out to one of the resources on that page if you need help.

Questions about the guidelines?
Email trust@sovraos.com
Last updated: July 18, 2026
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceGet HelpCookie PreferencesAppeals